Sneak Peak: Eliyahu Goldratt’s Conflict Resolution Diagram provides analysts with a powerful tool for navigating complex stakeholder conflicts. Analysts can resolve disputes in a way that meets diverse stakeholder needs by focusing on identifying shared goals, surfacing hidden assumptions, and seeking creative solutions. While the process may require time and deep analysis, the long-term benefits of using this structured approach far outweigh the potential challenges. Analysts who master this tool will enhance their problem-solving capabilities and foster greater collaboration and alignment across teams.

Understanding the Conflict Resolution Diagram by Avoiding Typical Ways Analyst Team Leaders Address Stakeholder Conflict

As analysts, we often encounter complex challenges when stakeholders' needs and requirements conflict. We may feel confused and overwhelmed by stakeholders with strong voices, particularly those in senior management, and prioritise their perspectives. Is there a better way to handle conflict resolution? Eliyahu Goldratt’s Conflict Resolution Diagram, also known as the Evaporating Cloud, provides a structured approach to resolving these conflicts. Whether you're a novice or an experienced analyst, mastering the effective use of this tool can significantly improve your problem-solving skills, especially when dealing with diverse and conflicting stakeholder demands. In this article, we’ll explore the steps for addressing conflicts, how analysts and team leaders typically resolve stakeholder differences, the history of the diagram, and its strengths and limitations.

What is the Conflict Resolution Diagram?

The Conflict Resolution Diagram is part of Eliyahu Goldratt's Theory of Constraints (TOC), a management philosophy that identifies and addresses the most critical limiting factors in processes. Goldratt introduced this tool to help organisations and individuals manage conflicts by surfacing underlying assumptions and finding win-win solutions. In an analyst's context, this tool is particularly useful when conflicting requirements arise from different stakeholders or when decision-makers within teams can’t agree on a direction. The goal is to break through deadlocks and provide actionable insights.

Steps to Address Conflict Using the Conflict Resolution Diagram

1. Identify the Goal - Start by defining the common goal that all parties involved in the conflict are aiming to achieve. For instance, for us as analysts, this could be "Deliver insights that improve business decisions" or "Provide accurate data interpretation."

2. List Conflicting Requirements - Each stakeholder or team member may have different needs. For example, Stakeholder A may prioritise speed and rapid delivery, while Stakeholder B may prioritise accuracy and thorough analysis.

3. Explore Assumptions Behind the Conflict - The key aspect of using the Conflict Resolution Diagram is to uncover the assumptions driving each requirement. For example, Stakeholder A might assume that faster results will provide the business with a competitive edge, while Stakeholder B might assume that hasty analysis leads to poor decisions.

4. Challenge and Evaporate the Conflict - Once assumptions are identified, challenge them. Is it possible to meet both speed and accuracy by changing the process? Perhaps automating certain tasks or running parallel analyses could satisfy both parties. The objective is to find a solution that "evaporates" the conflict by aligning the needs of both parties.

Typical Ways Analyst Team Leaders Address Stakeholder Conflict

Leaders in analytics teams often face conflicts between stakeholders, especially when requirements clash. Some common approaches include:

• Clarifying Objectives - Leaders ensure that all stakeholders understand the project’s core goals.

• Mediating Discussions - Bringing stakeholders together to discuss their assumptions and requirements openly often reveals solutions.

• Prioritising Based on Impact - When time is a factor, prioritising which insights will have the most significant impact on the business can help balance conflicting requirements.

• Seeking Win-Win Solutions - Leaders aim to accommodate as many stakeholder needs as possible by leveraging creative problem-solving techniques like the Conflict Resolution Diagram.

History and Discovery of the Conflict Resolution Diagram

The Conflict Resolution Diagram is part of the broader Theory of Constraints introduced by Eliyahu Goldratt in the 1980s. Goldratt initially applied TOC in manufacturing to identify bottlenecks and optimise production. However, he soon realised that conflicts in decision-making were a significant bottleneck in all areas of business, which led him to develop the Evaporating Cloud tool as a means to resolve such conflicts. Analysts can apply the Conflict Resolution Diagram in various situations, including:

• Stakeholder Management - When two or more stakeholders have conflicting needs or requirements for a project.

• Team Dynamics - When team members disagree on the approach or methodology to be used in a project.

• Process Improvement - When there is a conflict between short-term gains and long-term sustainability in business processes.

• Decision-Making - When analysing different business strategies that have competing outcomes.

Strengths and Limitations of the Conflict Resolution Diagram

The advantages of using a Conflict Resolution Diagram include bringing assumptions to light, providing a structured approach, and being applicable across industries. One of the tool’s most significant advantages is its ability to surface hidden assumptions that drive conflicts. By making these assumptions explicit, it becomes easier to find creative solutions. This diagram offers a clear, logical process for resolving conflicts, making it easier for teams to collaborate effectively. The diagram can be used in various contexts, including business, project management, and interpersonal relationships.

Limitations of the Conflict Resolution Diagram include the need for deep analysis, the fact that it does not always lead to immediate solutions, and the assumption of rational behaviour. Surfacing assumptions can be difficult. It requires individuals to think critically about their motivations, which can be time-consuming. While the tool is excellent for surfacing assumptions and exploring possibilities, it does not always provide immediate answers, particularly if stakeholders are unwilling to budge. The diagram works best when people act rationally. In some cases, personal agendas or emotional factors can complicate conflict resolution.

Counterarguments and How to Handle Them

Some might argue that focusing too much on the Conflict Resolution Diagram can slow down decision-making. In fast-paced environments, pausing to analyse each conflict could be seen as a waste of time. However, this is where the experience of a seasoned analyst comes into play. Effective analysts can quickly identify whether the tool is necessary and streamline its use for specific, high-impact conflicts.

How Analysts Can Be Aware of This

As an analyst, it’s essential to understand that conflicts are a natural part of working with multiple stakeholders. The Conflict Resolution Diagram offers a proven framework to resolve those conflicts by challenging assumptions and finding solutions that align with everyone’s goals. To incorporate this tool into your work:

• Practice Using the Diagram - Start by applying it to small conflicts in your daily work. As you become more familiar with the process, you’ll be better prepared to tackle larger, more complex conflicts.

• Facilitate Open Discussions - Encourage stakeholders to share their assumptions and be willing to challenge their own.

• Don’t Be Afraid to Push Back - If a conflict arises from misaligned priorities, don’t hesitate to suggest alternative approaches that could satisfy all parties.

In this section of our Newsletter, we aim to highlight the work that all our Being An Analyst members are doing to better the community at large. If you would like to be featured here, kindly send us an email: [email protected]

Free Being An Analyst E-Book Download

You are invited to download a free e-book on Kindle using the below link: https://amzn.to/4eJkyqq
The e-book will be free download will only be activated for these dates
11 October 2024
25 October 2024
All analysts are welcome to have a copy (irrespective of country)

Test Your Product/Services in Mid-Spring Market Day

Monitoring and Evaluation, closing 27 October 2024

Are you service provider that have a history and a proven track record in overseeing parts of a monitoring and evaluation framework are encouraged to apply to provide the following services:

✔ To conduct a tracer study of two of the outcome indicators of the project over the lifecycle of the project;

✔Conduct an evaluation of the career guidance activities for one of the outcome indicators;

✔ Evaluation of the implementation of the gender strategy across different training measures;

✔Conduct KOMPASS which includes qualitative data collection and analysis of different perspectives of key actors involved in the project.

Your proposal must be submitted to [email protected] by 27 October 2024. Please quote reference 83473282 when submitting the documentation. Late submissions will not be accepted.

Get Private Banking Previledges Today

Are you Planning a Newsletter?

Analyst Team Effectiveness with the Robbins and Judge Model

The effectiveness of our analyst teams is crucial for helping organisations to stay competitive. While we have explored various frameworks previously, one powerful framework that can help improve team performance is the Robbins and Judge Model. This model offers a comprehensive approach to understanding and enhancing team effectiveness by considering context, composition, work design, and processes. The Robbins and Judge Model is named after its creators, Stephen P. Robbins and Timothy A. Judge, who are renowned scholars in the field of organisational behaviour. Their model is based on extensive research and practical insights into how teams function in diverse organisational settings. It is widely recognised for its holistic approach, which makes it particularly useful for large and diverse organisations… Read More

Building a Strong and Effective Analyst Team: Understanding The Lencioni Model

In 2019, I met someone for coffee after connecting at a company event. They recommended a book called “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team.” This book resonated with me and I highly recommend it for teams facing productivity issues without major conflicts. At times, it may feel like the analyst team has reached a glass ceiling of peak performance. As analysts, one of our main roles involves working within teams to solve complex problems and deliver insightful results. A well-functioning team can be a game-changer, driving innovation and success. However, even the best teams can face significant challenges. Patrick Lencioni’s model, introduced in his book, provides a valuable framework for understanding and overcoming common team pitfalls. This article aims to explain the Lencioni model straightforwardly, making it accessible for both novice and seasoned analysts… Read More

Why Buy ‘Being An Analyst’ Book?

'Being An Analyst' is your essential guide to becoming not just an analyst, but a catalyst for success and a driver of organisational change. Order your copy Today!!

This book is the definitive guide to unlocking the transformative potential of informed decision-making and supercharging your analytical skills. Whether you're a budding analyst or a seasoned pro, this book is your ticket to becoming a catalyst for success and a driving force for change within your organisation.